Our website use cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements(if any). Our website may also include cookies from third parties like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click on the button to check our Privacy Policy.

The future of tariffs under Trump

https://i.abcnewsfe.com/a/d5565d47-f17d-42f9-b104-2066829b44bd/trump-manufacturing-facility-rally-ap-lv-241118_1731958389382_hpMain_16x9.jpg?w=992

At the end of January 2025, the U.S. government revealed its intentions to impose tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals, steel, and computer chips. This action seeks to strengthen local manufacturing and tackle trade imbalances. Yet, these steps might profoundly impact global trade relations, especially influencing major U.S. partners in Asia.

Effects on the Semiconductor Sector

The semiconductor industry is set to be notably impacted by these planned tariffs. Asia leads in worldwide chip production, producing over 80% of the planet’s semiconductors. Prominent firms such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) and South Korea’s Samsung Electronics along with SK Hynix are key suppliers to the American market. For example, TSMC, recognized as the largest contract chip manufacturer internationally, earns about 70% of its revenue from North American customers, including tech powerhouses like Nvidia and Apple. Although TSMC is investing in a $65 billion production facility in Arizona, most of its output still occurs in Taiwan, which exposes it to the proposed tariffs. In a similar vein, Samsung and SK Hynix, which together hold around 75% of the global DRAM market, might encounter obstacles due to their significant exports to the United States.

The semiconductor sector is poised to be significantly affected by these proposed tariffs. Asia dominates global chip production, accounting for over 80% of the world’s semiconductors. Leading companies such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) and South Korea’s Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix are major suppliers to the U.S. market. For instance, TSMC, the world’s largest contract chipmaker, derives approximately 70% of its revenue from North American clients, including tech giants like Nvidia and Apple. While TSMC is investing in a $65 billion manufacturing facility in Arizona, the majority of its production remains in Taiwan, making it susceptible to the proposed tariffs. Similarly, Samsung and SK Hynix, which together control around 75% of the global DRAM market, could face challenges due to their substantial exports to the U.S.

The pharmaceutical industry is also a key target of the proposed tariffs. Japanese pharmaceutical enterprises, such as Takeda, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, and Eisai, hold considerable interests in the U.S. market. For instance, Takeda noted that more than half of its revenue in the previous fiscal year was generated from the U.S., whereas Astellas mentioned that 41% of its earnings were derived from the U.S. market. Tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals might disrupt their operations and financial outcomes, potentially resulting in higher costs for U.S. consumers.

Steel Sector and Wider Economic Effects

Steel Industry and Broader Economic Implications

International Trade Relationships and Possible Retaliation

The suggested tariffs have raised worries among U.S. allies in Asia. Nations such as Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan, crucial to the worldwide supply chains of semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, could face economic difficulties due to diminished competitiveness in the American market. These countries might look to negotiate exemptions or contemplate retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports, possibly initiating a cycle of trade conflicts.

National Economic Factors

Domestic Economic Considerations

While the tariffs aim to promote domestic manufacturing, they could have mixed effects on the U.S. economy. Importers are likely to pass increased costs onto consumers, leading to higher prices for goods such as electronics and medications. Additionally, industries dependent on imported components may face challenges in sourcing materials, potentially hindering production and innovation. Economists caution that such protectionist measures could disrupt supply chains and may not yield the intended benefits of job creation in the targeted industries.

By Karem Wintourd Penn

You May Also Like