In an expansive warehouse in eastern Thailand, near a major highway, government inspector Thitipas Choddaechachainun meticulously examines piles of discarded electronics—circuit boards, scrap metal, and aging computer accessories. Each week, she and her team from the Thai Ministry of Industry investigate unauthorized facilities handling electronic waste, collecting samples for laboratory testing and regulatory enforcement.
Choddaechachainun heads a committed team focused on tackling the nation’s escalating issue with electronic waste, also known as e-waste. Even with regular checks and operations on these unauthorized facilities—many of which are concealed in remote areas to evade attention—the magnitude of the issue keeps growing.
Thailand is dealing with the consequences of shifts in global electronic waste allocation. Previously, countries like China handled the majority of digital discards from wealthier nations, particularly the United States and European Union members. This changed in 2018 when China implemented a ban on e-waste imports, prompting exporters to seek alternative locations in Southeast Asia, with Thailand being among the selected ones.
In response, Thailand imposed its own ban on e-waste imports in 2020. But the results have been far from reassuring. According to Earth Thailand, a nonprofit environmental advocacy group, e-waste imports have skyrocketed from approximately 3,000 tonnes annually before the Chinese ban to around 60,000 tonnes today.
This influx is partly fueled by high turnover rates in electronic devices among Western consumers. Frequent upgrades to smartphones, laptops, and other electronic goods—combined with widespread ownership of large household appliances—generate substantial waste. Although international regulations aim to prevent the export of hazardous waste to developing nations, loopholes remain. For example, shipments are often misdeclared as used electronics meant for resale, only to be dismantled and smelted upon arrival.
The recycling procedure poses significant environmental risks. In Thailand, electronic waste is dismantled and melted to reclaim valuable materials such as copper and gold. While this method of recovery is profitable, it emits dangerous substances like mercury and lead, contaminating the air, soil, and water.
Thai authorities estimate that most of the recovered metals are sent to China, leaving behind the environmental and social toll.
Thai Industry Minister Akanat Promphan addresses the impact of these activities. He emphasizes that the illegal recycling industry does not contribute positively to the nation’s economy and instead negatively affects local habitats and communities. His ministry has launched an intensified initiative to shut down unauthorized operations and eliminate foreign-owned facilities involved in illegal actions.
“Thailand is being used as a dumping ground,” Promphan says. “We are dealing with an international waste processing operation that brings no benefit to our country but leaves a trail of destruction.”
The negative consequences extend to individuals like Seng Wongsena, a 57-year-old agricultural laborer in eastern Thailand. He states that polluted discharge from a close-by smelting facility has harmed his cassava plantation, and the smell of burning debris disrupts his sleep at night. Local activists claim that the smelting operation operates without the necessary permits and are calling for intervention from government authorities.
On an international level, the consequences are alarming. According to the United Nations, more than 60 million tonnes of electronic waste are created worldwide annually—twice the amount documented 15 years prior. Projections indicate that this number could increase by more than 30% before the decade concludes.
Despite the alarming increase, only about 20% of global e-waste is recycled through responsible and sustainable channels. The rest ends up in landfills or is processed in unsafe conditions, often in countries with limited regulatory oversight.
Several nations have enacted regulations regarding extended producer responsibility. These regulations hold producers accountable for the disposal of their goods once they reach the end of their life span. Companies such as Apple, Samsung, and Dell are being urged to establish methods for reclaiming and recycling their merchandise.
Thailand is considering a similar legislative framework, aiming to strengthen local enforcement and reduce illegal activities related to e-waste handling. Promphan is optimistic about its future implementation.
“I’m hopeful that we will pass this new law soon—either by the end of this year or early next year,” he says. “We need comprehensive action to eliminate this illicit industry and protect our people and environment.”
As Thailand works toward legal reform and improved oversight, its efforts serve as a microcosm of a much broader challenge. E-waste management requires global coordination, transparent supply chains, and the cooperation of both consumers and manufacturers. Without significant change, the environmental cost of our digital age may far outweigh its benefits.
