Italian fashion brand Prada has openly admitted the cultural roots of a new shoe design following backlash over its similarity to traditional Indian shoes. This recognition arises as discussions intensify in the fashion sector about the need to value non-Western inspirations and honor cultural heritage in design.
The debate was ignited after Prada introduced a new design of slip-on footwear that bore a strong resemblance to the traditional Indian jutti—a handmade leather shoe recognized for its curved tip and detailed embroidery, prevalent in many parts of India. Although the luxury brand did not initially acknowledge any cultural sources, fashion critics and individuals on social media rapidly noted the noticeable likenesses, leading to claims of cultural appropriation.
Critics argued that by marketing the shoes without crediting their origins, Prada had overlooked the cultural and artisanal history behind a design that holds deep significance in South Asian communities. Many emphasized that such practices contribute to a pattern of global fashion houses drawing from non-Western traditions without giving due recognition or compensation to the cultures from which they borrow.
In reaction to the criticism, Prada issued a declaration recognizing that the design was inspired by traditional Indian shoes and showed gratitude for the artistry that shaped the collection. The brand also reaffirmed its dedication to honoring global cultures and striving for more inclusivity and understanding in its creative approach.
This move by Prada is part of a broader reckoning in the luxury fashion industry, where discussions around cultural representation, appropriation, and inclusivity have taken center stage. Consumers today are increasingly vocal about holding brands accountable—not just for the aesthetic choices they make, but for how those choices engage with and reflect diverse cultural narratives.
Classic Indian juttis transcend mere fashion; they stand as a representation of cultural identity and masterful craftsmanship, crafted by talented artisans utilizing time-honored techniques passed down over ages. Traditionally, both men and women have donned juttis for formal ceremonies, spiritual gatherings, or daily use. Their creation generally features leather or textile foundations, intricate hand embroidery, bead detailing, and lively hues—all distinctive elements of Indian artistry.
In the past few years, there has been an increasing worldwide recognition of traditional Indian designs, influenced partially by diasporic impact, cultural interactions, and a rising interest in eco-friendly fashion methods. Nonetheless, this heightened awareness has raised worries about the distinction between appreciation and appropriation. When international brands embrace these styles without giving credit, it not only obliterates the history behind these designs but also sidelines the communities and artisans who keep them alive.
Prada’s response to the criticism may signal a shift toward more responsible engagement with global design traditions. While acknowledging the oversight, the brand has also hinted at possible collaborations with artisans from the regions that inspire their collections. Such partnerships—if implemented meaningfully—could create pathways for recognition, economic support, and the preservation of traditional craft.
Industry experts note that while inspiration is a natural part of fashion’s evolution, the context in which a design is adapted matters. Giving credit, telling the full story, and including the voices of those whose cultures inform a design are key to creating an ethical and respectful creative process. Brands that fail to do so risk alienating consumers and perpetuating long-standing inequities in how fashion’s cultural capital is distributed.
For Prada, recognizing their actions might mitigate some of the backlash they face, but it also establishes a standard for how international fashion brands should handle cross-cultural design in the future. Shoppers today are more knowledgeable and involved, leading to a greater call for openness, not just in obtaining materials but also in the origin of concepts.
Several other fashion brands have faced similar scrutiny in recent years, prompting some to overhaul their creative and marketing strategies. Some have started collaborating directly with craftspeople, while others have incorporated advisory panels to ensure cultural sensitivity. These steps, though varied, point toward a more inclusive fashion future—one that values origin as much as innovation.
As fashion continues to globalize, the dialogue around ownership, heritage, and recognition becomes more complex—and more essential. The conversation extends beyond aesthetics to include economic justice, intellectual property, and the right of communities to see themselves represented accurately and respectfully on international platforms.
In recognizing the Indian roots of its footwear design, Prada has taken a step—albeit a reactive one—toward aligning with these evolving values. Whether this moment leads to lasting change in how the brand engages with cultural influences remains to be seen, but it marks another chapter in fashion’s ongoing journey toward greater accountability.
In the end, the future of design depends on teamwork, openness, and mutual respect. As the sector progresses, companies that adopt these values are more prone to create genuine relationships with worldwide audiences and establish legacies founded on more than just aesthetics, but also on cultural authenticity.
